A regulatory toolbox for AI, American support for Ukraine, and how a “parents’ rights” organization left its mark on education politics.
View in browser
Brookings Brief

October 11, 2023

A member of Moms for Liberty protests against mandatory face masks for students during the COVID-19 pandemic
Moms for Liberty: Where are they, and are they winning?
 

Since its founding in 2021, Moms for Liberty—a conservative “parents’ rights” organization engaged in local school board politics and elections across the country—has emerged as a visible player in U.S. education politics. Sana Sinha, Nicolas Zerbino, Jon Valant, and Rachel M. Perera explain where the group operates and its possible impact.

Read more
President Joe Biden and First Lady Dr. Jill Biden greet President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Mrs. Olena Zelenska of Ukraine at the South Portico of the White House
A new American strategy for Ukraine
 

“Helping Ukraine is still the right thing to do. But helping Ukraine ‘as long as it takes,’ as Biden and his team are prone to say, is fundamentally unsatisfying,” says Michael E. O’Hanlon. In a new op-ed, he outlines some considerations for the president in pivoting U.S. engagement with the Russia-Ukraine war.

Read in The Hill
Startup Cerebras Systems AI supercomputer Andromeda is seen at a data center in Santa Clara, California
The AI regulatory toolbox: How governments can discover algorithmic harms
 

Governments around the world are implementing foundational policies to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic systems, but while legislation is advancing, regulators should not wait idly for legislators to act. Alex Engler discusses the tools that are already available to regulators seeking to make headway on AI.

Read more
 
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn
Brookings

The Brookings Institution,1775 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036

Unsubscribe | Manage newsletter subscriptions 

The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars.