Sep 10, 2023 View in Browser

ALM | Law.com International

The Global Lawyer

Click to view Newsletters Links

Connecting Legal Trends From Around the World

Law firms are obsessed with growth. More are merging, launching new offices, teaming up through associations, and even changing their structure so they can compete globally. But is their focus on expansion and revenue growth the way to go? Might it be short-sighted? 

 

I'm Lisa Shuchman, Executive Editor of Law.com International, bringing you this week's edition of The Global Lawyer.

 
Alternate text

Law firms are obsessed with growth. 

 

This isn’t a new phenomenon, but since the COVID pandemic, the focus on size has ramped up, adding another dimension. The “small is beautiful” phenomenon certainly never caught on in the legal world. Instead, law firms seem to subscribe to the “too big to fail” mentality. The ghosts of big law firm failures, like the 2012 collapse of Dewey & LeBoef, evidently no longer haunt the legal world. 

 

Firms today appear to be inspired, or even driven, by the likes of Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins, which reported revenue of more than $6.5 billion and $5.3 billion respectively, according to the 2023 Am Law 100 rankings. DLA Piper, Baker McKenzie and Skadden all broke the $3 billion mark. And if they improve on their revenue figures, firms such as White & Case, Sidley Austin, Clifford Chance, Ropes & Gray, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, and Hogan Lovells won’t be far away. 

 

And in any discussion of law firm growth, the pending merger of Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling merger can’t be ignored. If it goes through, the new combined firm will almost certainly join the $3 billion club. 

 

Even Hogan Lovells, which ended merger talks with Shearman & Sterling earlier this year, still wants to grow its international presence. Miguel Zaldivar, who this month was re-elected for another term as firm CEO, told Law.com last week that the firm will double down on expansion in key U.S. markets through group lateral hires and will remain in China, where many of its peer firms have pulled back. 

And has the firm now abandoned thoughts of a merger? Not exactly. 

 

“Do we need a merger? No.” Zaldivar said. But he added that if it found the right partner, “it would be irresponsible to not consider it.”

 

But is such a focus on expansion and revenue growth the way to go? Might it be short-sighted? Profits will track revenue, but only to a point. A firm that grows too quickly is at risk of having to cut quickly. Somewhere there will be diminishing returns. Why aren’t more firms focusing on their core areas, client needs and profits rather than unbridled growth?

CONTINUE READING
 

Trending Stories

Is Slaughter and May's 'Best Friends' Network Really That Effective?

International Edition

How Was Summer? Rubbish!

International Edition

Have Foreign Firms Lost Their Appeal for Lawyers in China?

International Edition

General Counsel Compensation Chart: Who Made the 2023 Top-Paid GC List?

Corporate Counsel

Could ‘Core Hours’ Help Firms Balance Mandates With Flexibility? Few Are Willing to Try

The American Lawyer

Get all your news and analysis about legal industry developments in one place.

You can subscribe to other newsletters from Law.com or Legal Week or unsubscribe from this one on the newsletters section under MyAccount, where you will see all the newsletter options.

Connect With Law.com International

This newsletter was sent to newsletter@newslettercollector.com
Unsubscribe |  Email Preferences |  About Us |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC.
All Rights Reserved.
ALM Global, LLC
150 E 42nd St | New York, NY 10017 | 1-800-543-0874