What’s going on here? The US announced sweeping tariffs on imports from over 60 countries based on a methodology that… had analysts pulling out their calculators. What does this mean? This latest round of tariffs is two-fold: a baseline 10% levy on all imports from more than 60 countries, along with “reciprocal” taxes as high as 34% for China, 46% for Vietnam, and 49% for Cambodia. Now, the math here was always going to be complicated. The US president not only pledged to match levies imposed on America but also said he’d counteract non-tariff trade barriers – and that impact is tough to summarize in precise figures. So it seems the White House has simply divided each trade deficit by the value of that country’s exports to the US. Method aside, the end result is the biggest US tariff increase in decades. Unsurprisingly, investors quickly dipped out of major indexes. Why should I care? For markets: The president played favorites. The president sees these tariffs as supporting domestic manufacturers. By making imported wares more expensive, he figures, American buyers should be more likely to shop local. That, in turn, would bolster revenue for US firms and create more jobs. So you can see why the president shielded international steel, copper, and aluminum suppliers from the worst of the fees: stateside manufacturers rely on the stuff. Zooming out: You can run, but you can’t hide. Nike, Adidas, Lululemon, and Gap moved production from China to Vietnam to dodge targeted taxes. But with Vietnam now pulled into the kerfuffle, these firms – and others like them – face dwindling alternatives and rising costs, which’ll likely be folded into prices for shoppers to cover. Then, cash-strapped customers might decide those new sneakers aren’t worth it. And that could give smaller American companies a chance to steal market share. US firms that are free of international supply chains and have plenty of local customers could skirt most of the taxes, keeping prices relatively stable. |