Disneyland character, parade employees look to unionize | 3 strategies to keep your top talent on the team | Boost your leadership with a personal SWOT analysis
Disneyland character and parade department employees announced plans to unionize as part of the Actors' Equity Association, which already represents employees at Disney World. About 35,000 employees of the California theme park are already members of unions, with 1,700 employees not unionized.
Improve the chances of your top talent sticking around by creating a sense of belonging, encouraging them to think outside the box and leveraging AI in training to help them improve communication skills, writes Juan Betancourt, the CEO of Humantelligence. "Meeting each employee where they are will go a long way toward fostering the trust and belonging you need to execute your vision for the team," Betancourt notes.
There are several strategies to help remove potential stigmas surrounding career and technical education, Amy Heflin, senior manager of curriculum development at FlexPoint Education Cloud, writes in this blog post. Heflin emphasizes personalized teacher-student relationships, educating parents on CTE value through success stories and statistics and fostering CTE advocates among educators to reshape perceptions and demonstrate the broad benefits of CTE for students' future success.
In the words of business school professor Robert Sutton, downsizing companies have gone full "jargon monoxide" trying to avoid backlash on social media. Using buzzwords such as "involuntary career event" or "corporate outplacing" is doing more harm than good, Sutton opines.
“Jargon monoxide” might be my new favorite term. I can’t wait to use it in a conversation with a custom content client.
Stanford business professor Robert Sutton introduces us to “jargon monoxide” in today’s HR Leader story about the language some companies use when laying off staffers. He says that companies are opting for terms like “rightsizing” and “simplified operating model” in a move to soften the blow of what’s happening.
“They somehow seem to believe that if they use language that is more vague and less emotional, that people won’t get as upset,” said Sutton.
Is it working? Hard to tell, but our coverage shows that employers don’t want to take chances. They are worried about the impact to their brand if they don’t tread lightly and treat the situation with utmost care. They don’t want to get canceled.
My opinion? I don’t like vague terms. And, when I’m having a tough conversation, I prefer to get to the point -- even if the dart is pointed at me. Be clear. Be straight. Treat me like an adult and professional. This is life. My spine can handle it.
What do you think? Am I oversimplying this? Be honest ;-) I can take it. Do you HR and manager folks out there think there’s value to softer language in the process of a layoff? Let me know! And if you enjoy this brief, tell others so they can benefit also.
Sharing SmartBrief on Workforce with your network keeps the quality of content high and these newsletters free.