Hi Everyone,
It never fails. Hit the send button on a piece of analysis that you've poured your sweat and tears into, then 30 seconds later, watch the market render it irrelevant.
This is a particularly bad problem in the digital asset space, since crypto is so volatile, but it's certainly not a new phenomenon.
Those of you who've ever written any sort of financial analysis know exactly what I'm talking about. Over time, the good ones tend to develop a sense of covering both sides of the market, not trying to predict the future, but rather exploring the various paths the markets may take.
Much to my dismay, this almost happened yesterday, as we suggested in the BMJ newsletter that bitcoin was holding up well against the U.S. dollar strength, only to see it take a spill shortly after publishing and give yet another strong test of the key psychological level of $10,000.
By now though, as tends to happen far more often then can be explained by skill, the market has found a way to vindicate my words.
A strong surge in bitcoin, which seems to have been caused by a timely short squeeze, is seen showing a strong push off that technical level and massive green gains in the rest of the coins as well, moves that are only loosely reciprocated by the traditional markets.
In the short-term, it's unclear if we're out of the woods or going in deeper, but market analysis always works better in the long-term, as do investment strategies.
For those of you who do like to trade for fun with high risk in the short-term, you should know that we've got a large amount of bitcoin and ether options expiring tomorrow.