Editor’s note: Would your retirement survive a 70% drop in the stock market? Would you be forced to keep working, borrow money, or sell the family home? If you want to discover a way of ensuring your money is safe for when you need it most, check out this video from financial planner Vern Gowdie. |
|
FANGAM — The ‘Fable a New Generation Accepted Mindlessly’ |
Tuesday, 31 January 2023 — Gold Coast, Australia | By Vern Gowdie | Editor, The Daily Reckoning Australia |
|
[9 min read] In today’s Daily Reckoning Australia, the dominance of the mighty six FANGAM stocks spread the belief that ‘you could not go wrong buying them’. But it’s exactly this line of thinking that destines disappointment to whatever it is assigned to. In essence, whatever ‘you can’t go wrong buying’ is put in front of is likely at its riskiest state… |
|
Dear Reader, The acronym FANGAM was made famous in the Everything Bubble. Facebook (now, Meta). Amazon. Netflix. Google. Apple. Microsoft. The dominance of these mighty six spawned widespread belief in their pricing invincibility. You could not go wrong buying FANGAM. The investing public’s absolute conviction in FANGAM was music to the investment industry’s ears. FANGAM ETFs were rushed to market. Ka-ching! Sit back and take the ride to higher and higher prices. Oh, if it were only that easy. Since the S&P 500 Index peaked in early 2022, this is how the FANGAM cohort has performed: Each one has underperformed the broader S&P 500 Index. As you’ll see shortly, this comes as no surprise. But first, I’d like to share a lesson a very experienced investor shared with me more than 20 years ago. Whenever a sentence is prefaced with ‘you can’t go wrong buying…’, whatever follows is destined to disappoint. Why? Because once every man, his dog, and pet budgie accept and fervently believes you can’t go wrong buying X, Y, or Z, all risk has been discounted out of the investment equation. Which means the investment proposition (whatever it is that’s captured investor imaginations) is at its…RISKIEST. Such was the impact of this lesson; I was compelled to pass it on in two of my books. In A Parent’s Gift of Knowledge (the book written for my daughters in 2011), I wrote (emphasis added): ‘There are a number of accepted truisms relating to investing in shares. A couple of these are: In the long-term shares always go up; and You can’t go wrong buying blue-chip shares. ‘Both of these statements are only partially correct and should not be treated as gospel. In my experience, these statements have been marketed by self-serving groups such as share brokers, financial planners, investment institutions, and media commentators with vested interests. If they say it often enough, the average person will believe these are statements of fact without questioning the premise.’ Also, from Chapter One of the book I wrote in 2017, How Much Bull Can Investors Bear? (emphasis added): ‘The unquestioned belief in the trend continuing without disruption inevitably causes its demise. At the mature stage of the trend, it’s common to hear phrases such as: “This time it is different” and “you can’t go wrong buying…”, “There is no alternative” — complacency-bred contempt.’ ‘You can’t go wrong buying’ is a half-truth (along with a few others) that goes unchallenged in roaring bull markets. The mindless acceptance of these easy-to-roll-off-the-tongue clichés happens (with an all-too-predictable repetitiveness) every single cycle. You can’t go wrong buying…these are five words you should be alert to. When to believe half-truths When is a half-truth true? In the second half of the cycle…the down phase AFTER the up phase. In July 1932, after the Dow Jones had lost almost 90%, ‘you can’t go wrong buying’ would’ve been brilliant advice. But who was saying it then? And, even if someone was, who listened? Yet, three years earlier, in mid-1929, ‘you can’t go wrong buying’ was being touted on every street corner. The story of Joe Kennedy (father of JFK) liquidating his portfolio after receiving stock tips from the shoeshine boy has become part of market folklore. A much lesser known story is the one told by Bernard Baruch (a highly successful financier that left Wall Street to be an adviser (for four decades) to a succession of US presidents): ‘Taxi drivers told you what to buy. The shoeshine boy could give you a summary of the day's financial news as he worked with rag and polish. An old beggar who regularly patrolled the street in front of my office now gave me tips and, I suppose, spent the money I and others gave him in the market. My cook had a brokerage account and followed the ticker closely. Her paper profits were quickly blown away in the gale of 1929.’ CNN Money Towards the peak of a bull market, the shout of ‘you can’t go wrong buying’ is almost deafening. At the bottom of a bear market, ‘you can’t go wrong buying’ is said in whispered tones. Happens every cycle This 20 January 2023 tweet from Jeff Weniger, Head of Equities — WisdomTree Asset Management, shows that ‘what happened in 1929, DID NOT stay in 1929’. The ‘you can’t go wrong buying’ mentality was repeated in the early 1970s, dotcom bubble, and the Everything Bubble. The top 20% of stocks (those the investing public fell in love with at any price) in the boom, subsequently underperformed in the bust: Almost three years ago, the June 2020 issue of The Gowdie Letter delved into past episodes of market infatuation with ‘hot’ stocks…the titans of their generation. Here’s an edited extract: ‘“In the United States, the term Nifty Fifty was an informal designation for fifty popular large-cap stocks on the New York Stock Exchange in the 1960s and 1970s that were widely regarded as solid buy and hold growth stocks, or ‘Blue-chip’ stocks. These fifty stocks are credited by historians with propelling the bull market of the early 1970s…” ‘Wikipedia ‘The popularity of the “solid buy and hold growth stocks” is evident in this chart…comparing the performance of Growth versus Value stocks since 1974. ‘The buying momentum (and belief) in this cohort of growth companies, pushed share prices of “solid buy and hold growth stocks” to an excessive premium. ‘As always, the pendulum eventually swings from “over to under”. ‘When (far more reasoned) fundamental valuation metrics prevailed, that excessive premium subsequently collapsed to a significant discount. ‘The swinging of the pendulum acted like an executioner’s axe on the share prices of high-profile growth stocks: ‘After the carnage on Wall Street was over, post-mortems were conducted. ‘In 1977, Forbes published an article titled “The Nifty Fifty Revisited”. Here’s an extract (emphasis added): ‘“The Nifty Fifty appeared to rise up from the ocean; it was as though all of the U.S. but Nebraska had sunk into the sea. The two-tier market really consisted of one tier and a lot of rubble down below. What held the Nifty Fifty up? The same thing that held up tulip-bulb prices long ago in Holland – popular delusions and the madness of crowds. The delusion was that these companies were so good that it didn’t matter what you paid for them; their inexorable growth would bail you out.” ‘Getting caught up in market hype appears to be a generational rite of passage. ‘It would take another 25-years before we saw the next major disconnect between Growth and Value stocks. ‘A new generation of investors believed — like they did in the 1970s — this time was different. ‘Why? ‘The Industrial Revolution was about to be replaced by the Technological Revolution. ‘Different theme, but same old animal spirits. ‘When a boom is in full swing, there’s no (perceived) limit to the share prices of popular growth stocks. ‘No amount of reason can persuade investors of the folly in this thinking. ‘Especially when you have dominant players like IBM, Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Oracle, and Apple. ‘These were not your run-of-the-mill dotcom start-ups…they were the titans of tech. ‘Throw in big pharma like Merck and a banking giant like JPMorgan and a fast food whopper like McDonald’s, and how could you go wrong? ‘And therein lies the small but very critical tell-tale sign of a market close to its peak. ‘Any sentence prefaced with “you can’t go wrong buying…” is the closest you’ll get to a bell ringing at the top. ‘Whatever that universally recognised risk-free investment is…then you can be assured it’s at a point of MOST risk. ‘As the Growth versus Value chart shows, the growth stock excessive premium was once-again plunged into the deeply discounted zone. ‘Here’s how it happened: ‘And, here we are, 20 years later, with a new generation of investors. ‘It’s somewhat fitting that the most overvalued market in history is now registering the most excessive premium in Growth versus Value. ‘Very poetic…a spectacular climax to precede (what will be) an equally spectacular collapse. ‘I know people think “it’s different this time”. But it’s not. ‘Popular thinking is the current generation of high-profile growth stocks are unlike any that have gone before us. ‘And, given their market dominance, it’s easy to see why that view is held. ‘In the midst of this absolute belief in FANG[AM] prices growing to the sky and beyond, the prospect of a 50, 60, or even 80% fall in their share prices is not only inconceivable…it’s laughable. ‘Investors in the 1970s and early 2000s thought the same thing about the growth stocks of those eras. ‘But fall they did. ‘The pendulum always swings. ‘The mistake investors made on each previous occasion — and this also happened in 1929 — is they believe these dominant companies operate in some parallel universe…one that’s not connected to real economic activity. ‘Facebook. Apple. Netflix. Google. Amazon. Microsoft. ‘Each one if these companies generate revenue from businesses and consumers in the real economy. ‘If people out in the real economy are doing it tough, that pain finds its way to the bottom lines of FANGAM. ‘Flat to falling earnings multiplied by a shrinking PE ratio, produces the blue-chip carnage of 1973–74 and 2000–02. ‘Look what happened to the Microsoft PE ratio after peaking in 2000: ‘Unless it’s different this time, expect to see FANGAM leading the charge down…and taking the market-weighted S&P 500 Index with them. ‘With history telling us how this “market darling” phenomenon ended in 1929, 1973, and 2000, FANGAM should take on a whole new meaning for investors… ‘Fearful. Anxious. Nervous. Guarded. Alert. Mindful.’ As the FANGAM versus S&P 500 performance chart shows, what was identified in June 2020 appears to be playing out. Alerting investors to how these episodes of infatuation with popular stocks end was, in hindsight, 18 months too early. Such is the nature of this forecasting business. You can identify trends, draw parallels with history, and then you have to wait for human nature (be it greed or fear) to exhaust itself. How near or far that point of exhaustion might be is an unknown. And, believe me, waiting can try your patience. But what we do know is this…the ‘Fable a New Generation Accepted Mindlessly’, never has a fairy-tale ending. And, for those who think the worst is over for FANGAM, don’t bet on it. With a (most likely, very nasty) US recession ahead, both earnings and PE ratio (the multiple applied to earnings) are likely to go through a process of contraction…at least, that’s been the lesson from history. In the fullness of the cycle, my experience is these lessons tend to be highly predictive. Regards, Vern Gowdie, Editor, The Daily Reckoning Australia | By Bill Bonner | Editor, The Daily Reckoning Australia |
|
Dear Reader, We begin with a bleak update. From The Daily Caller: ‘Americans Getting Poorer As Real Disposable Income Plummets Over A Trillion Dollars In 2022’: ‘Over the course of 2022, America’s real disposable income fell to its lowest level since the 1932 Great Depression, Heritage economist EJ Antoni said Thursday…He said the 2.1% real GDP for 2022 was the slowest growth since 2016, outside the 2020 and 2021 pandemic years. ‘The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis shows real disposable personal income dropped to -6.4%, data released by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis shows. The steep decline cost Americans over a trillion dollars in 2022, Antoni reported.’ Did real incomes really fall to 1932 levels? Probably not…let’s get the report directly from Heritage.Org: ‘New data released Thursday showed prices have risen 13.7% since President Biden took office, as measured by the consumer price index (CPI). The overall price level declined 0.1% last month but increased 6.5% in 2022, a year which saw four-decade-high inflation. Even as the increase in the CPI slows, many consumer staples remain highly elevated compared to the start of the Biden administration: eggs are up 189.9%, ground beef 21.1%, gasoline 44.3%, electricity 21.3%, transportation services 19.5%, and housing 11.8%. ‘EJ Antoni, research fellow in regional economics with The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis, released the following statement Thursday on the latest data: “Biden’s presidency has been marked by excessive spending, borrowing, and printing of money by the federal government. The result has been an appalling rise in inflation to levels not seen in 40 years. “If you are wondering where the government got the trillions of dollars in extra spending over the last two years, they are taking it out of your hide right now through the hidden tax of inflation. Every time you put gas in your tank or groceries in your back seat, you are paying Biden’s inflation tax. “Prices have risen so much faster than wages that the average family has lost $6,000 in purchasing power. As the Federal Reserve belatedly raises interest rates to fight the very inflation it helped cause, interest rates are rising fast, increasing borrowing costs by $1,400. Combined with falling real wages, the average family has effectively lost $7,400 in annual income since Biden took office.”’ The US’s poor middle class Until now, the economic story has been fairly simple. The feds spent too much. They financed excess spending with ‘printing press’ money. The result was inflation — a tax, US$7,400 so far, for every family in the country. The Fed is now working to bring consumer price inflation under control. Its higher rates have caused trillions in losses to investors and are leading to a recession, probably later this year. Note also that the primary trend has reversed. That too is easy to understand. After 40 years of rising stock and bond prices, they’re now going down. And as long as the Fed continues to raise its key lending rate…and reduces the nation’s money supply…asset prices are more likely to go down than up. In brief, the primary trend aims to correct the excesses of the last 20 years — the rich got too much of the money, interest rates were too low, stock prices were too high (especially the techs), flaky ‘assets’ (cryptos...NFTs) were worth billions, debts and deficits were out of control...the Greenspan, Bernanke, Yellen, Powell Put distorted the markets…stimmy cheques distorted the economy…and much more. According to some estimates, the 2021 correction erased US$30 trillion from the world’s (paper) wealth. And the yield on US 10-year Treasury bonds is now seven times higher than it was in 2020. So you see, dear reader, God is in His Heaven, the king is on his throne…and the Fed and Mr Market are both on the job…both bringing things back to ‘normal’. Elites bank 10 times But this phase is unusual. And probably temporary. It’ll probably end soon. Before too long, the Fed and Mr Market will part company. The fiscal and monetary policies of the last two decades were exceptional. As we saw, above, they cost the middle class a lot of money. The aforementioned US$7,400 is just the most recent and most obvious tab. Our own calculations show that the common working man has not had a real raise in nearly 50 years. The things that really matter — his food, his shelter, his energy, and his wheels — are much more expensive, requiring him to sell more of his precious time just to keep up with them. But while the ordinary citizen was getting poorer, the rich — that is, the elite — got richer, faster than any time in US history, with nearly all the increase in wealth going to the richest part of the population. Here’s David Stockman with the figures: ‘…the net worth of the top 1% of households increased by a staggering 192% during that 13-year period, rising from $15.6 trillion in Q4 2008 to $45.6 trillion in Q4 2021. ‘That $30 trillion gain, however, was 10X more than the $3 trillion gain attributable to the bottom 50% of households.’ Naturally, the feds want to keep the show on the road. That is how they win the support and admiration of their elite brethren…it’s their source of campaign contributions, bribes, and sinecures…and it’s how they pocket the wealth that previously belonged to the ‘The People’. Yes…the Fed will ‘pivot’. And that is when the next phase…much harder to understand, much more difficult to navigate…will begin. Investors will rejoice. Homeowners will see their houses rise in price. Wages will rise. The economy will appear to boom… …and the middle class will get even poorer. More to come… Regards, Bill Bonner, For The Daily Reckoning Australia Advertisement: Introducing SON of FORTESCUE The small explorer we’ve dubbed ‘Son of Fortescue’ is looking to ‘own’ the Northern Territory rare earths scene...just like Fortescue ram-raided the Pilbara in the 2000s... They’re aiming to directly attack Lynas Corp’s almost complete game dominance...again, like Twiggy gazumped BHP and Rio Tinto. Like Fortescue, it’s not satisfied with just the small crumbs of a big pie. It has a modest market share of a gargantuan revenue pot that 99 out of 100 small-cap miners would be more than happy with. THESE GUYS WANT MORE. Much more. The Son of Fortescue is gunning for hyper-dominance: supplying a full 10% of the world’s entire demand. With advanced exploration in place...once it moves to mining...it will be in a very exclusive club of dedicated REE suppliers... WHO IS SON OF FORTESCUE? WATCH THIS… |
|
|