Everyone has a price.

Manage newsletters

View in browser

With Roger Sollenberger, Political Reporter

Pay Dirt is a weekly foray into the pigpen of political funding. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Thursday.

 

This week’s Big Dig . . . How A Powerful GOP Senator Is Profiting From The Tech Giant at The Center of The TikTok Debate.

One of the most powerful corporate entities in the country, which has a number of controversial ties to China, appears to have been providing a passive revenue stream to an influential Republican senator for years.

 

Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT), who sits on the powerful Finance Committee and chairs the Senate GOP’s campaign arm, has deep ties to Oracle, dating back to his life as a private-sector entrepreneur. Those relationships continued while Daines was in office, reaping hundreds of thousands of dollars if not more from the Austin, Texas-based software and analytics giant.

 

Today, Oracle is at the center of the complex but heated national political debate about TikTok and its relationship with the Chinese government, with its $1 billion TikTok data management contract playing a key role in the controversy. While the TikTok discourse has dominated the national stage lately, that contract is just the tip of the iceberg for Oracle, a powerful beltway player that has seen a number of recent scandals—including deadly failures from a Veterans Administration project and ties to dicey security contractors in China.

Bozemen

 

Daines, who ranks among the wealthiest members of Congress, struck it rich when his then-business partner, former Rep. Greg Gianforte (R-MT), sold a tech company to Oracle in 2011 for $1.5 billion. After the sale, Daines drew an annual salary of more than $550,000, with additional rental income from office space that he leased to Oracle, Salon previously reported.

 

Daines still co-owns the office park that hosts Oracle’s Bozeman campus, through his stake in Genesis Partners LLC. (Gianforte is a partner in Genesis, as well; Montana business filings show that the agent of record is Daines’ father, Clair Daines.) Financial disclosures show that Daines is still raking it in through his leases—even as he advocates today for legislation that would benefit his corporate benefactor.

 

The Daily Beast sent questions to Oracle and to a Daines spokesperson, but did not receive a reply.

 

Answers in Genesis

 

Because financial disclosures provide values in wide ranges instead of precise amounts, it’s hard to hang an exact number on Daines’ income from Oracle since he became a senator, though it’s likely in the millions.

 

Montana real estate records show that Genesis Partners holds five commercial lots in Bozeman, boasting a combined assessed market value of around $19.5 million. Leases from those lots provide Daines a personal revenue stream. His most recent annual disclosure—filed last April and covering the 2022 calendar year—reports those leases generated between $415,000 to a little more than $4 million in personal income. Since Daines took office in 2015, his Genesis Partners leases have cumulatively reaped at least $3.5 million on the low end, with that total potentially running as high as 10 times that amount. (His top leases bring in between $100,000 and $1 million a year.)

 

It’s difficult to say which of those leases are with Oracle, because the lack of specificity in disclosure rules makes it difficult to peg a particular lease to an individual parcel in public records. However, Daines’ disclosures put the top value ranges for his Genesis properties between $1 million and $5 million, with each of those four properties yielding between $100,000 and $1 million in annual rental income. Address records show that the two most valuable Genesis parcels are both associated with Oracle, meaning that Daines appears to have derived a minimum $200,000 in rent from Oracle each year, with an annual ceiling potentially in the millions.

 

Big Sky Country

 

A personal financial relationship between a sitting senator and a giant multinational company like Oracle, which holds a number of contracts with federal agencies, is all but certain to spill over into the policy sphere—and that is what happened with Daines.

 

Daines, an outspoken critic of the Chinese government, largely stayed on the sidelines when then-President Donald Trump first floated the idea of a national TikTok ban in 2020. Elected officials backed off from that idea in favor of an arrangement in which TikTok would put a U.S. company in charge of its stateside data operations. The company that won the $1 billion TikTok contract was Oracle.

 

In 2022, a BuzzFeed News investigation exposed TikTok’s ongoing ability to access private U.S. user data within China. The report singled out the Oracle arrangement, casting serious doubts on whether Oracle had full control of its TikTok data. In response, Daines blasted TikTok for potentially compromising national security, without mentioning Oracle’s own reported role.

 

“TikTok’s deep ties to communist China and their unwillingness to be transparent in regards to data transmission is more than cause for concern—it’s a threat to our national security,” Daines told NBC News in a statement. “We need answers from TikTok immediately on its policy of sharing Americans’ private information with the CCP.”

 

More recently, Daines has kept his views on a federal TikTok ban close to the vest—though last year he backed a controversial and unprecedented state-level ban on all use of the app within Montana’s borders, a bill that his old business partner Gianforte, now governor, signed into law. Before the ban took effect, a state judge enjoined it as unconstitutional. Montana appealed that ruling in January, and legislators in the heavily Republican state have taken up the ban as a cause célèbre, even as Donald Trump and other GOP figures have reversed or softened their positions.


This is an excerpt. More details about Daines’ legislative efforts and Oracle’s political influence can be found in the full version, accessible here.

 

Advertisement

 

From Roger’s Notebook...

Filing day. The most recent national fundraising numbers are in, covering the month of February. Here’s a breakdown of what’s new with the Trump and Biden campaigns and the national party committees—how much they raised and spent, and what they’ve got on hand.

 

TL;DR: The Biden campaign has $71 million on hand, more than double the Trump campaign. (Yesterday, Reese Gorman and I reported that Trump’s “Save America” PAC/legal slush fund is now racking up legal costs at the rate of more than $230,000 per day.) 

 

The same partisan cash disparity also holds for the national parties—the Democratic National Committee has $26.5 million on hand, more than double the Republican National Committee’s $11.3 million. (More than $4 million of that RNC total was raised into accounts that cannot be used for political activity.)

 

Biden campaign:

Raised: $21.3 million

Spent: $6.2 million

Cash on hand: $71 million

 

Trump campaign:

Raised: $10.8 million

Spent: $7.8 million

COH: $33.5 million

 

Democratic National Committee:

Raised: $16.6 million

Spent: $14.1 million

COH: $26.5 million

 

Republican National Committee:

Raised: $10.6 million

Spent: $8 million

COH: $11.3 million

 

National Republican Congressional Committee:

Raised: $8.1 million

Spent: $5.8 million

COH: $45.2 million

 

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee:

Raised: $14.5 million

Spent: $7.2 million

COH: $59.2 million

 

National Republican Senatorial Committee:

Raised: $13.1 million

Spent: $6.5 million

COH: $24.8 million

 

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee:

Raised: $9.5 million

Spent: $4.6 million

COH: $31.9 million

 

Well done. Indicted Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) raised exactly zero dollars into his leadership PAC last month, according to a new FEC filing. However, the PAC did shell out $589.32 for a catering expense to upscale D.C. haunt Morton’s Steakhouse. The PAC also paid $3,000 for fundraising consulting services that appear to have yielded no results.

 

Five days after that reporting period ended, Menendez and his wife were hit with yet another superseding indictment, the fourth set of charges in the case since September. (It’s the fifth total Menendez indictment if you include the one from 2015, where he was ultimately found not guilty.) Prosecutors added a dozen new charges, bringing the total facing the couple to 18—including bribery, wire fraud, extortion, and acting as a foreign agent.

 

Menendez stepped down as chair of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee after charges were first announced in September, and on Thursday he announced that he would not seek re-election this year in the Democratic primary—though he left the door open for an independent bid. His trial is scheduled for May.

 

iHeart money. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) has argued that his podcast deal with corporate radio giant iHeart Media does not violate Senate ethics rules, with a campaign spokesperson telling Forbes in December 2022 that there’s “no difference” between running a personal podcast and other media appearances, like a cable news interview.

 

But filings from a super PAC aligned with Cruz show at least one major difference—profit. A lot of it.

 

On Wednesday, that super PAC—called “Truth and Courage”—reported a $215,000 payment from iHeart Media, described as “digital revenue.” That brings the super PAC’s total payments from iHeart up to more than $615,000 since the podcast partnership launched in early 2023.

 

Because super PACs are supposed to be independent from candidates, Cruz’s deal raises serious ethical questions; the profits also essentially reflect the candidate providing the super PAC with a massive revenue stream. But, as real Pay Dirt heads already know, Cruz has always been remarkably synched up with Truth and Courage. They share a number of the same donors and consultants—even paying some of the same local restaurants—and partnered in a fundraising bus tour during the 2022 midterms.

 

That same year, Truth and Courage paid more than $1.5 million for “media production” services to Reagan Investments, the entity that formerly produced the podcast, called “Verdict With Ted Cruz.” After inking the deal with iHeart in early 2023, those payments began flowing to a Houston-based media firm called “The Production Companies, Inc.” 

 

So far, Truth and Courage has paid that company around $270,000—less than half of the $615,000 that the podcast has earned the super PAC over that same period.

 

In confirming the podcast partnership to Forbes in 2022, an iHeart Media spokesperson claimed that the Texas conservative was volunteering his time, without providing further detail about the agreement.

 

No limit. The National Republican Senatorial Committee—the Senate GOP’s official campaign arm—is asking the courts to remove the limits on how much money it can spend in “coordinated party expenditures” with its Senate candidates. The NRSC—which can currently spend up to $1.1 million in coordinated party expenditures backing a GOP Senate nominee—sued the FEC to settle the question, and the case is currently in front of the Sixth Circuit of Appeals.

 

Earlier this month, however, Ohio Attorney General David Yost (R) filed an amicus brief in the case, which was joined by other attorneys general from a dozen safely red states. Yost argued in part that the cap should be lifted because political parties have lost influence in modern elections, claiming that these entities are less prone to corruption than more lightly regulated groups like super PACs, which can raise and spend money in unlimited amounts.


In an ironic bit of timing, Yost filed that brief almost one year to the day after the former chair of the Ohio Republican Party was convicted on corruption charges related to a $60 million bribery scheme. Former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder was also convicted, and the two men were sentenced last year. After the convictions, Yost issued a statement applauding the verdicts and stating that his office’s work was far from over, vowing justice for other people involved in the scandal.

 

More From The Beast’s Politics Desk

Rep. Marc Molinaro (R-NY) is, curiously enough, an admitted Mary Poppins fan. But Riley Rogerson found that the admiration appears to be mutual. An anonymous social media account with the handle @MPoppinsNY, named “Mary Poppins,” has been pumping out pro-Molinaro content in more than 200 posts supporting the congressman, written in the beloved fairy tale nanny’s voice. While Riley wasn’t able to confirm who exactly was behind those posts, she did find evidence that suggests it’s someone with access to Molinaro’s own social media accounts. Definitely give this fun story a read.

 

Kate Briquelet reported on another political messaging mystery this week. In recent weeks, a spate of digital billboards have popped up around North Carolina and Georgia featuring a photo of Trump with his arm around disgraced billionaire pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, who had a decades-long acquaintanceship with the former president. But it’s not clear who is behind the billboards—there’s no paper trail other than a small disclaimer that reads, “Paid for by ProtectChildrenQ LLC,” a potential reference to the QAnon conspiracy theory cult. Find out where Kate’s investigation took her, and, if you can, help us solve the mystery.

 

Unable to come up with the half-billion dollars to secure a bond for his business fraud court appeal, Trump is now facing the possibility of asset seizures. On Thursday, New York AG Letitia James took steps toward commandeering Trump’s 212-acre Seven Springs estate—a property that figured prominently in her yearslong investigation. Jose Pagliery, who has been doggedly untangling Trump’s snowballing legal escapades, has the details for you, as well as a look at what might come next—read that here.

 

We'll be back next week with more Pay Dirt.  Have a tip? Send us a note and subscribe here.

 
Daily Beast
FacebookTwitterInstagram
© 2024 The Daily Beast Company LLC I 555 W. 18th Street, New York NY, 10011

Privacy Policy

If you are on a mobile device or cannot view the images in this message, click here to view this email in your browser. To ensure delivery of these emails, please add emails@thedailybeast.com to your address book. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, or think you have received this message in error, you can safely unsubscribe.
https://elink.thedailybeast.com/oc/5581f8dc927219fa268b5594kpbq8.7tv/a1add53a