MARK RUTTE was surely embarrassed when Trump posted screenshots of fawning texts from the NATO leader lavishing the US president with praise. But a bit of personal humiliation would be a small price to pay if his shameless flattery succeeds in convincing Trump to view NATO’s fractious deal on spending targets as a mighty personal victory. "You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,” Rutte wrote, even mimicking Trump's writing style. The real humiliation would be if it doesn’t work.
WHAT’S ACTUALLY IN THE DEAL? Rutte has repeatedly stressed that all 32 NATO allies are ready to commit to spending 5% of GDP on defence. On paper, that delivers on a key Trump demand for all to pay their fair share. But dig into the details and there’s a lot of questions about just how serious the whole deal is. Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez (who apparently plans to sign the pledge) keeps telling everyone his country has no plans to budge above 2.1%.
To be clear, the commitment is not all show. Many allies appear ready to spend VERY REAL MONEY, and some have already made budget plans to hit the higher targets. But there’s still reason to think it’s not just the Spaniards who will go on spending far less.
THANKS FOR IRAN. Rutte has tried to minimise discussion of US attacks on Iran, which drew split reactions from alliance members, by insisting that the focus in The Hague is on military investments and support for Ukraine. But he was full of praise for the airstrikes in his texts with Trump, sending congratulations for "decisive" and "truly extraordinary" action in Iran – something “no one else dared do” that “makes us all safer”. Was that puffery, personal opinion, or the view of NATO?
ARTICLE 5 ‘NUANCES’. Sticking to his habit, Trump once again cast doubt over his commitment to the alliance, refusing to discuss his understanding of the alliance’s Article 5 mutual defence clause when asked by reporters aboard Air Force One.
Trump’s remarks raised some eyebrows in The Hague, but NATO brass were quick to downplay them. Rutte told reporters that he has “NO DOUBT” that Washington remains committed to mutual defence. Meanwhile, Trump promised more clarity upon arrival in The Hague. We’re all ears.
WHAT PLAYS IN KYIV? Trump may score a political victory with new spending targets, but Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy is still hunting for anything that he can sell as a win back home – even a message from Trump that Russia is “VERY BAD” might suffice. He's unlikely to get much from the main leaders-only summit meeting in the morning, but the summit sidelines are where diplomacy happens and deals get done. A crucial one-on-one with the US president may be in the works. And Zelenskyy is also scheduled for an afternoon meeting with the leaders France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the UK.
NATO PATH. Remarks about Ukraine’s “irreversible path to NATO membership” used to be ubiquitous at alliance gatherings. So Rutte’s invocation of the phrase stood out only because of how little anyone else is talking about it.
MAKE MORE WEAPONS, PLEASE. “It is time to move from pledge to product," Ruben Brekelmans, the Dutch defence minister told a room full of defence industry execs yesterday. Brekelmans struck a note repeated by other government officials, who’ve been pleading with industry to churn out more weapons. Even though years of warfare in Ukraine has depleted NATO stockpiles, production lines are still under heavy strain and prices remain high.
“Theres not enough supply to answer the demand,” a senior NATO official told Firepower this week. Take in-demand Patriot air-defence systems, for example. The lead time for delivery of a Patriot battery is currently seven years, according to Admiral Pierre Vandier, NATO’s supreme allied commander transformation. |