Trusted by over 100,000 blockchain investors.
INDEPENDENT AND AD-FREE
May 1, 2020
Last week we discussed the 1918 Flu Pandemic, which looks eerily similar to today. There was one image that perfectly captures the three levels of a pandemic: physical, financial, and political.
An arresting image.

You’ve got a New York policeman (political), with his mask and gloves (physical), holding onto the traffic signal reading BUY LIBERTY BONDS (financial).
During a pandemic, these three layers—physical, financial, and political—are all one thing. This is what we’re seeing, especially in the United States.
  • Physical: People are staying at home, not working (or working less productively, because Netflix)
  • Financial: So they're not getting paid, which means they don't buy as much (so vicious spiral)
  • Political: Governments print money and mail checks ("helicopter money")
“So why not go back to work?” they say. To which we respond, “What work?”

Until we get a vaccine, this is the New Normal. So remember our goal:
  • Discover vaccine
  • Produce vaccine
  • Convince everyone to get the vaccine

Then we are out of the woods.

Meanwhile, while we work on a physical cure, we’ve got a lot of financial and political problems to solve.

Which brings us to Saving Our States.

How to Save Our States (#SOS)
In a nutshell: states make most of their money from income tax and sales tax. When people aren't working and aren't spending, the states also have a cash flow problem.

This is why New York governor Andrew Cuomo has been asking repeatedly for federal help, telling the U.S. government, “You can’t pass the buck without passing the buck.”

In plain English, states need money to pay for things like police officers and teachers. When they don’t have enough cash on hand -- because they, too, are out of work -- they turn to the federal government.

Here’s what that conversation between the state government and federal government looks like:
Now, for the twist:

  • The state governments have to balance their budgets.
  • The federal government can print money.

If you've seen the funny Netflix cooking show Nailed It!, the judges have a "money gun" where they fire cash onto the winner at the end of the show. Essentially, this is what the federal government is doing. 
Federal monetary policy in the time of Coronavirus.

The problem is, a "money gun" is not exactly a financial plan. The states -- like all of us -- need a better solution than waiting for the federal government to rescue them.

Throughout this pandemic, I've noticed two types of people. The first type is sitting at home, unsure what to do next, trusting the government will eventually figure it out. The second type is hustling, learning, figuring out how they're going to adapt to the #NewNormal. They're reinventing themselves.

As this recession wears on, the states -- like all of us -- will eventually be faced with a decision. Do we default on our debts, or do we reinvent ourselves and find new ways of making money?

Fortunately, this is not the first time we've faced this problem.

The Liberty Bond
During World War I, the United States was faced with the great challenge of how to pay for the escalating costs of the war. They created the Liberty Bond, which transformed the way "money was done."

In a Liberty Bond, you essentially loaned money to the government to finance the war. (This was before the days of a $750 billion national defense budget.) There were a few flavors of Liberty Bonds: corporate bonds (expensive), individual bonds (affordable), and even collectible stamps (for the poor).

These were heavily promoted via a massive communication campaign enforcing the idea that buying war bonds was every citizen's patriotic duty. And the repeated messaging worked, raising $17 billion for the war effort. Every citizen, on average, bought $170 of bonds (about $3,500 today).
Like all bonds, Liberty Bonds paid interest on a regular basis. On the date of repayment, the principal was paid in full. Citizens were taking a leap of faith that the government would win the war and pay them back, which had a secondary benefit: it galvanized public sentiment that the government should win the war. It united the cause.

Liberty Bonds also transformed personal finance, because it was the first time most citizens invested in something new and weird. This innovation would last one hundred years, with governments regularly issuing bonds to raise money for new projects. "New and weird" eventually became "old and boring."

Eventually this innovation would even reach down to the state level, where municipal bonds were issued to raise money for, say, a new school or subway line. Citizens bought bonds (lent money) to the state government, who would pay them back interest over time, and eventually repay the bond in full.

Here's what that conversation between the state government and citizens looks like:
Municipal bonds are actually quite safe: they pay you back 99.9% of the time. Also, they’re commonly called "munis," which is just too cute.
“Isn’t he adorable? I named him Muni.”

In the time of Coronavirus, municipal bonds will be a way for states to raise money directly from the public (rather than waiting for the “money gun” from the federal government). But how do states issue municipal bonds, when their citizens don’t have money to spend?

Enter the Blockchain Bond.

Introducing the Blockchain Bond
Simply put, a blockchain bond is just like a traditional bond, but issued and traded on the blockchain. This has a number of huge benefits, which we'll discuss below. First, let’s unpack how they work, for those new to blockchain.

In 2017, the Initial Coin Offering was all the rage. The ICO allowed any investor to easily “buy into” a new blockchain project, being paid in “tokens” (like shares) that could be traded on the digital asset markets (like Binance or Coinbase).
Let's say you had an idea for a blockchain-based dating app called BlockDate. Using blockchain, you could quickly issue tokens called BlockCoin (like issuing shares of stock), sell them on the open market (like an Initial Public Offering), convert your tokens back to dollars (like cashing out), and use it to hire your BlockDate team.

Turns out the government didn’t like people printing their own money. So the party eventually ended -- but the model worked. Today, this blockchain-based fundraising model is being used to finance blockchain bonds.

For example, the bond-i project, a collaboration between World Bank and Australia’s CommBank, has issued two successful bond offerings, run entirely on blockchain. Here’s a quick video:
Why are blockchain bonds better?
Four reasons: They are more efficient, more transparent, more trusted, and more interesting.

Blockchain bonds are more efficient. The typical bond issuing process looks like this:

Especially where bonds move into the secondary market (the “ladder” part of this diagram), it’s far simpler to just let investors buy and sell their blockchain-based “bond tokens” directly (like we buy and sell bitcoin and other digital assets).

Blockchain bonds are more transparent. All the information about the bond is stored on the blockchain, bringing transparency to an otherwise dark and closed system.

This also improves bond ratings, which have been criticized for being (at best) their own dark and closed system, or (at worst) a “pay to play” system where issuers can ratings agencies to buy better ratings, as Steve Carell demonstrates in The Big Short:
"Holy s*** -- they're selling ratings for fees."

With blockchain bonds, investors can see the information themselves (though they may still need experts to help them make sense of it).

Blockchain bonds are more trusted. Let’s face it: Bondsare boring. In fact, bonds are the go-to "safety asset" that investors choose when they don’t want excitement. But in a time of Coronavirus, the opposite could happen: investors could flee junk bonds, which causes the whole Jenga tower to collapse, as Ryan Gosling and Anthony Bourdain explain:
The default on junk bonds, in other words, could cause a “domino effect” that would ripple throughout the bond market, then take down the entire world economy.

If and when this happens, it will be hard to restore public confidence in the safety of bonds. Blockchain bonds – a technology built on trust – will work to restore this confidence.

Blockchain bonds are more interesting. Here’s the deal: blockchain is cool. Those of us who have bought bitcoin, or some other digital asset, know how fun it is to watch the ticker every day. Blockchain bonds provide some of that real-time dopamine thrill, but with more safety and less volatility.

Think of blockchain bonds like a kinder and gentler roller coaster.

"Buy Blockchain Bonds"
To summarize: as the federal government fires its “money gun,” states will create blockchain bonds to directly petition the people.

The final piece of the puzzle will be educating and encouraging the public to buy these bonds. Which brings us back to Liberty Bonds.

The first Liberty Bond issue was unsuccessful. It wasn’t until the U.S. government got their propaganda machine churning out millions of posters, window stickers, and buttons that the public really got on board. They enlisted celebrities to headline bond rallies, like the great movie star Douglas Fairbanks:
This glimpse into the past is likely a glimpse into the future. As governments try to work their way out of the CoronaCrisis, they will likely turn to their citizens for help. Citizens will not be an easy sell, unless blockchain bonds are communicated far and wide.
Blockchain bonds (a technology of trust), combined with a massive media campaign (Coronavirus Communications), are likely to turn the tide in the CoronaCrisis. States will raise the money, citizens will invest in the future, and blockchain will boom.

That’s how we get to the #GreatRecovery.


Health, wealth, and happiness,
John Hargrave
Publisher
Bitcoin Market Journal
Hi Everyone,

"Sell in May and go away, then come back on St. Leger's Day."

An old English trader's saying, it refers to the practice of leaving London during the summer to ride out the hot months in the countryside. Then, it involves coming back for a giant horse race that was apparently held in mid-September.

The invention of the air conditioner in 1902 means that now aristocrats can be a bit less seasonal with their investment/gambling habits and over the last decade, the market has fallen in May exactly three times, two of which showed only miner losses. Yet, somehow every year on May Day (1st of May (today)) several analysts, myself being guilty as well, write articles with the title "Sell in May" followed by a big question mark.

Well, this year all those question marks have been replaced by a giant exclamation point.
But Why?

The U.S. stock market put up its best performance since 1987, which is pretty unbelievable considering that the unemployment rate, over the last two month, has swung from record lows to record highs.

Apple's losses reported yesterday were quite expected, but what really caught investors off-guard is...
In short, they had a great quarter, but it seems they're reinvesting a lot of the money into their employees, PPE, safety, and infrastructure. In the words of Jeff Bezos:
Frankly, I'm not sure what investors are bellyaching about. It should probably be seen as a good thing that Amazon is moving to protect one of the only remaining parts of the fragile supply chain that's still functional. It also shouldn't come as too much of a surprise. It's quite characteristic of Amazon to reinvest profits whenever they can, which is how they grew so fast to begin with. 

The drop in AMZN shares is perhaps not too brutal. It's only come down slightly from the all time high in overnight trading, but it does seem to have put the market into a bit of a mood.
As well, I'd also mention that the ECB's failure to woo investors with their new program is not a positive sign at all.

Still, past performance is not an indication of future results. Fighting the Fed has proven deadly for many a brave investor over the last few decades, so it's difficult to say with any degree of certainty which way we'll go from here.
Disjuncting

But does 'sell in May' apply to bitcoin?

When I posted the adage on Twitter last night, I guess it was inevitable that many followers thought I was talking about BTC. Suppose it goes to show the association people make about my analysis. But... as we've been repeating lately, the price action between bitcoin and the stock markets has been quite correlated post COVID-19. 

So if stocks are going down, it kind of makes sense that bitcoin might do the same. Doesn't it?

Well, maybe not. Over the last 48 hours or so, we've seen a few rather encouraging moments of decoupling. In this graph we can see bitcoin in orange and the S&P 500 index in blue. Notice that throughout the month of April they've been almost identical, save only for a classic bitcoin Bart pattern that took the price up at the beginning of the month and back down on the 13th. Of course, the action from the 29th onward doesn't need any special narration.
Still, correlations rely on long term data so trying to draw any real conclusions from this chart alone would be pretty foolish. What does give me pause about short term bullishness though is the wider downward facing channel that's formed in bitcoin over the last year. A channel that must be broached at this time and must be breached in order to make any real bullish calls.
If you enjoyed this newsletter, please feel free to send it to some friends or sign up here.
Best regards,






Mati Greenspan
Analysis, Advisory Money Management