The Rise of Performance-Based Funding
Dear John, In 1979, the state of Tennessee set the stage for a new higher education funding formula. Lawmakers decided to award a portion of tax dollars to institutions based on their performance within specific measures, such as retention or graduation rates. Though some states have abandoned this model, declaring it ineffective and unpopular, many have implemented similar approaches, as a way to spur accountability, eliminate inefficiencies, and increase innovations in teaching and learning.
Get your copy of our latest Chronicle issue brief, "The Rise of Performance-Based Funding: How Colleges are Adapting in the New Age of Accountability," for insight into the current national landscape of this funding model. You'll get success stories, expert advice, and data to help you navigate the intricacies of performance-based funding, which was created as an incentive for institutions to improve student success. Order the issue brief for insight into:
The motivations of lawmakers and others seeking greater accountability The types of institutional benchmarks used to demonstrate student success How to assess the effectiveness of different funding models How to avoid unintended negative consequences as you adapt Ways to work with your state and create fairer metrics Purchase your copy of the issue brief and ensure you understand the various approaches to this funding model.
Sincerely, Erin Gajarsa Director The Chronicle of Higher Education 1255 Twenty-Third St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy 