Everyone has a price.

Manage newsletters

View in browser

With Roger Sollenberger, Political Reporter

Pay Dirt is a weekly foray into the pigpen of political funding. Subscribehere to get it in your inbox every Thursday.

 

The Big Dig this week… How Trump’s Dark Money Machine Just Got Darker

Just when it seemed like former President Donald Trump’s dark money maze couldn’t get darker, it looks like someone shot the lights out.

 

At least, that’s the impression experts in nonprofit law took away from a pair of previously unreported tax filings from the dark money arm of Trump’s political machine, America First Works.

 

Those experts said it appears from the filings and other incorporation records that the advocacy group—which raised almost no money in 2021—has closed down its original Virginia entity and opened another one in Washington, D.C., under the same name, with the same board of directors.

 

The question is why—and it comes as Trumpworld is laying the groundwork for a second Trump term. Or, as Axios put it, “a sprawling infrastructure already preparing to staff a new administration and immediately enact major policies,” which Trump allies see as a key differentiator with potential GOP rival Ron DeSantis.

Rebuilding year

 

The upshot, however, is that 2021 was essentially a rebuilding year for Trump’s dark money machine. That work not only came at a cost, it also appears to have happened in a black box, adding another layer of opacity on top of a fundraising and advocacy network that’s already grown so convoluted, even legal experts have a hard time untangling it.

 

In this instance, not only is it hard to follow the money, it’s hard to say for sure whether there’s all that much money to follow in the first place. At least, there appears to be a lot less of it flying around in the fractious 12 months after Trump left the White House.

 

If you’re looking for lucidity, however, the following is not for the faint of heart.

 

The Great White North

 

AFW is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization, which are often colloquially called “dark money” groups. These groups can raise funds in unlimited amounts, and while they don’t have to disclose their donors’ identities, the organizations can use a chunk of that unattributed money for political activity.

 

According to its 2021 tax filing, which was first obtained by The Daily Beast, AFW—which raised about $51 million the previous year—doled out millions of dollars in transfers and grants.

 

That filing shows that the funds all went to a handful of groups that make up a financial and political support network behind the former president.

 

Those transactions included a $3 million grant to AFW’s 501(c)(3) counterpart, America First Policy Institute, and an additional $250,000 to Make America Great Again Policies—a lesser known entity which has reported having a cost-sharing agreement with a new pro-Trump super PAC. AFW also paid another $250,000 for “research” to Republican opposition research firm America Rising, according to the document.

 

The group also reported about $75,000 in in-kind contributions (under its old name, America First Policies) to a latent Trump super PAC called America First Action. That’s on top of a $1.75 million contribution to the same super PAC—a number that exactly offsets the amount in illegal donations the super PAC received from a Canadian billionaire in 2018, which it was ordered to refund last spring.

 

Sweet clarity

 

If these transactions seem confusing, with multiple similarly named organizations serving the same purpose, experts say that’s almost certainly part of the point—or at least a welcome side benefit, making the maze maddeningly difficult to follow.

 

But the filing also reveals one data point with comparative clarity: While AFW spent money, its revenue essentially fell to zero. That was a significant drop, from $51 million to just $33.00, leaving the group with about $1.2 million in the bank.

 

Brendan Fischer, deputy director of government watchdog Documented, said that while the dropoff happened in an off-election year, the amount “is precipitous, and can’t be explained by election cycles alone.”

 

Instead, as Fischer and other experts told The Daily Beast, it appears AFW quietly underwent a wholesale change, while keeping up outward appearances that it never stopped functioning.

 

“The in-kind contributions of staff time and office space indicate that AFW employees were still working and on the payroll in 2021,” Fischer said. Further, AFW’s website issues press releases, and its social media accounts are active.

 

“It also would be understandable if AFW was just going to spend down its existing funds and close up shop, but that’s not what’s going on either,” Fischer added, pointing out that AFW didn’t appear to make any meaningful political expenditures or donations in 2022. “Instead, for some unexplained reason, AFW set up a new entity with the same name.”

 

No comment

 

AFW did not reply to a request for comment for this article.

 

But its website offers a clue in its first press release, dated Nov. 5, 2021. The title, however—“AFPI Launches New Political Arm: America First Works”—is a lot clearer than the reality.

 

“Today, America First Policy Institute (AFPI) announced the establishment of its affiliated advocacy organization, America First Works,” the release says, calling AFW “a 501(c)(4) that will ignite the spirit of the nation.”

 

But as mentioned above, “America First Works” already existed. It was originally called America First Policies, a group Trump allies first created in 2017, and which raised that whopping $51 million in 2020.

 

According to IRS records first reported by the Center for Public Integrity, America First Policies changed its name to America First Works the month before the press release.

 

But last December, an AFW spokesperson told The Daily Beast it wasn’t a name change; America First Policies had been “sold” to America First Works “in a private deal” earlier this year, the spokesperson said.

 

“This is a different organization, under completely new ownership,” the spokesperson added. He declined to reveal the price of the nonprofit’s “sale,” a concept legal experts have questioned.

 

Extra gloves?

 

However, previously unreported tax filings now show that another “America First Works” was created that same year, this one in Washington, D.C.

 

AFW1 reported a $140,100 grant to the new America First Works (AFW2), which AFW1 cites as a related entity. But The Daily Beast also obtained AFW2’s tax filing, which shows that the two groups share a slate of directors and that the grant comprised all of AFW2’s revenue for 2021. Almost all the money—around $132,000 of it—was spent on a “security deposit,” the document shows, though it discloses no other underlying assets.

 

Again, all of these moves and name changes seem designed to do one major thing: confuse—at least for the time being. IRS filings generally aren’t available until the following November, so we can’t yet see what happened last year, leaving 2021 as something of a black box.

 

Reset button

 

But Lloyd Mayer, an expert in nonprofit law at the University of Notre Dame, said the filings also suggest a reset.

 

“This is some sort of shuffle or reorganization to move the entity to D.C. for some reason, and an attempt to transfer resources to the new D.C. entity and other groups. Why they decided to make that first entity passive, I can’t tell, but I don’t know why you’d particularly do that,” Mayer told The Daily Beast. “I’m not aware of any regulatory advantage, and in fact it would appear the opposite, because D.C. is Democratic-controlled and Virginia is not.”

 

Other filings suggest a shift in AFWs. For instance, Virginia incorporation records show that AFW1 dissolved and voluntarily terminated its status with the state last December. And the IRS notified AFW2 of its nonprofit status in a declaration letter in August.

 

“Sometimes when you see these types of changes going on, it’s a power struggle behind the scenes, but you can’t tell for sure without being in the room,” Mayer noted.

 

Phil Hackney, a nonprofit law expert at University of Pennsylvania, shared Mayer’s analysis, calling the move a “head scratcher.” Hackney also noted that last year the D.C. attorney general scored a $750,000 settlement from Trump’s inaugural committee over allegedly misspent nonprofit funds.

 

Bottom line

 

At the end of the day, however, it appears Trumpland has taken a revenue hit. The once-mighty nonprofit revenue stream appears to have dwindled to a trickle following the election, according to known tax records and public reports.

 

One 501(c)(4)—AFW—raised almost no money in 2021, down from $51 million. And while a new 501(c)(4), MAGA Policies, appears in Florida incorporation records, it does not show up in employer identification number searches in the IRS database, or in Massachusetts, where it is headquartered. The proTrump 501(c)(3) “America First Policy Institute” brought in only about $15 million in 2021, according to its tax filings, with Axios reporting that the group employs about 160 people on a $27 million budget this year.

 

Despite the confusion—“or maybe because of it,” Hackney told The Daily Beast—“it’s very important for the public to keep tabs” on the financial structure bolstering the Trump movement.

 

“These are things donors don’t likely know, either,” he said.

 

Read the full story here. 

 

Advertisement

 

From Roger’s Notebook...

Freedom of speech. Former President Donald Trump’s campaign reached a settlement agreement in its long-running nondisclosure agreement dispute with former staffer Jessica Denson, according to court documents filed Friday. The class action settlement is a major win for Denson, who has fought the NDA for years, and if the court approves, it could ultimately release more than 400 former employees, volunteers, and contractors from their own agreements, which a court found vague and “unduly burdensome,” allowing them to speak openly about their experiences on the 2016 trail.

 

While the agreement did not disclose the amount of money awarded to Denson and the team of law firms, the redactions indicate the firms won a sum of six figures, with Denson personally claiming something in the five-figure range. That money will likely have to come out of Trump’s old campaign account, now called “Make America Great Again PAC,” and should appear on upcoming FEC filings. Trump, however, has been swamped with legal fees. MAGA PAC’s latest report, covering through Nov. 28, shows only about $36,000 cash on hand, with another $17,000 in debt.

 

“The Great American Comeback.” That’s the name of a new mystery super PAC created last Friday, albeit in a not-so-mysterious location—the same building that headquarters all of Trump’s committees, including his 2024 campaign. The new group is located on the fourth floor, while Trump-linked entities have been housed on the second floor.

 

In that same building on that same day, another super PAC—“America Fund”—moved from the second floor to the fourth.

 

The last straw. The Federal Election Commission released on Thursday the details of an enforcement case that may have been the matter that finally convinced the FEC to establish clear disclaimer requirements for online political ads. In the case, the FEC’s Office of General Counsel recommended finding that one of the respondents—a super PAC backing Pennsylvania Democratic congressional candidate Jess King—had violated disclaimer requirements by not saying clearly who had paid for the promotions.

 

When it came to enforcement, however, the FEC deadlocked and dismissed the case. But four of the commissioners—three Republicans and Democratic chair Dara Lindenbaum—issued a Statement of Reasons explaining that when the agency took up the matter, “the Commission had not provided clear guidance on how the disclaimer requirements and exceptions apply to many types of internet communications,” pointing out that the issue had been resolved. The FEC approved the new disclaimer rules last month.


The next straw. Those disclaimer requirements still aren’t quite complete. As The New York Sun reported on Wednesday, the FEC is still seeking a rule regarding disclaimers on influencer ads—third parties who publish political posts “promoted for a fee” on their social media platforms, supporting or attacking candidates. While some say that paid influencer posts clearly fall under the disclaimer requirement—informing the public who was paying for them—detractors argue that such a rule might be too broad and vague, and runs the risk of overextending the definition of “political advertisement.”

 

More From The Beast’s Politics Desk

Walker, Warnock

The backers behind the Trump-friendly “Freedom Phone” have imploded over allegations of $10,000 video game shopping sprees. Phone buyers were left with broken $500 “paperweights,” according to its founder. Will Sommer has all the finger-lickin’ finger-pointing details.

 

The former Herschel Walker staffer who first detailed his account of sexual assault by conservative powerbroker Matt Schlapp to The Daily Beast has now slapped Schlapp (and his wife) with a $9.4 million lawsuit, alleging sexual battery and defamation. I’ve got the inside track on it, with Matt Fuller.

 

Firebrand Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert have officially fallen out, with disagreements over Trump, Ukraine, and Kevin McCarthy’s speakership devolving at one point into a shouting match in a Capitol Hill bathroom. Ursula Perano and Zach Petrizzo broke the news this week.

 

We'll be back next week with more Pay Dirt. Have a tip? Send us a note and subscribe here.

 
Daily Beast
FacebookTwitterInstagram

© 2023 The Daily Beast Company LLC I 555 W. 18th Street, New York NY, 10011

 

Privacy Policy

 

If you are on a mobile device or cannot view the images in this message, click here to view this email in your browser. To ensure delivery of these emails, please add emails@thedailybeast.com to your address book. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, or think you have received this message in error, you can safely unsubscribe.

https://elink.thedailybeast.com/oc/5581f8dc927219fa268b5594i1fuz.hl2/f693010a