Latest 3 Cases: United States v. Millan-Machuca (Civil Rights), United States v. Pedro-Vidal (Criminal Law), Lucaj v. Wilkinson (Government & ...

The Oprah Interview as a Truth Commission

LESLEY WEXLER

Illinois Law professor Lesley Wexler explains how Oprah’s interview with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle might illuminate how a formal truth commission to deal with legacies of racism and colonialism might function in the British empire. Professor Wexler describes the purpose and function of state-operated truth commissions and notes the similarities and differences between those and the interview.

Read More

United States v. Millan-Machuca

Dockets: 18-2175, 18-2195, 18-2179, 18-2189

Opinion Date: March 10, 2021

Judge: Kermit Victor Lipez

Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

The First Circuit affirmed the judgment of the trial court convicting Defendants - Rolando Millan-Machuca, Roberto Casado-Berrios, Miguel Rivera-Calcano, and Giordano Santana-Meledez - of racketeering and drug trafficking conspiracies, holding that Defendants' claims on appeal were unavailing. Specifically, the First Circuit held (1) the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions; (2) there was no merit to Defendants' claims of error in the admission of certain evidence; (3) Defendants' sentences were reasonable; and (4) Rivera-Calcano's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at his sentencing hearing is dismissed without prejudice.

United States v. Pedro-Vidal

Docket: 19-1441

Opinion Date: March 10, 2021

Judge: Jeffrey R. Howard

Areas of Law: Criminal Law

The First Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court denying Defendant's motion to strike the federal government's notice of intent to seek the death penalty (Death Notice) that was untimely filed, holding that the district court did not err in denying Defendant's motions to strike the Death Notice. Under the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico the federal government, if seeking the death penalty, must file a Death Notice within 180 days of an indictment containing a death-eligible offense. A Puerto Rico federal grand jury returned a five-count indictment charging Defendant with three offenses punishable by death. The government, however, did not file a Death Notice until after the 180-day deadline had expired. After Defendant unsuccessfully moved to strike the death penalty he appealed. The First Circuit affirmed, holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to strike without an evidentiary hearing because the purpose of the Local Criminal Rule was satisfied and the untimely filed Death Notice did not prejudice Defendant.

Lucaj v. Wilkinson

Docket: 20-1566

Opinion Date: March 10, 2021

Judge: Boudin

Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Immigration Law

The First Circuit reversed the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying Petitioner's request to reopen removal proceedings based on changed country circumstances, holding that the BIA's failure to assess whether certain changes were sufficient was arbitrary and capricious. Petitioner, a native and citizen of Albania, applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture, arguing that he and his family had been persecuted due to Petitioner's support of the Democratic Party in Albania and that the family had a well-founded fear of future persecution. An immigration judge denied relief, and the BIA affirmed. Petitioner later asked the BIA to reopen his case on the ground that government corruption had deteriorated in Albania. The BIA denied the request. The First Circuit reversed, holding that the BIA "exercised its judgment in an arbitrary, capricious, or irrational manner."