November 15, 2024 LAWSUIT LEADERBOARD | LEGAL MARKETING | TOP LEADS | GET LEADS Welcome to the TGIF edition of Law News for You—brought to you by LawyersandSettlements.com.
Lawsuit Leaderboard
The Top 10 legal news stories our readers were most interested in this week.
#1 Agreement to settle nearly 38,000 Bard hernia mesh lawsuitsColumbus, OH - Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD), the parent company of BARD, has agreed to settle about 38,000 hernia mesh lawsuits. Reports indicate that the total payouts could exceed $1 Billion. The mesh lawsuits, some of which go back almost 20 years, allege that Bard designed defective mesh products, failed to adequately test them, and didn’t properly warn users about potential risks.
#2 Nova Southeastern University to Settle ERISA Lawsuit for $1.5 MillionFort Lauderdale, FL - On October 9, Nova Southeastern University agreed to settle a long-running lawsuit in which participants in the Nova University Defined Contribution Plan claimed that the school had mismanaged their retirement savings by paying excessive recordkeeping fees and retaining underperforming investment funds. The plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval was unopposed.
#3 A Setback for Suboxone Film Plaintiffs: Northern District of Ohio's Dismissal DecisionCleveland, OH - On September 10, 2024, the Northern District of Ohio dismissed claims against Indivior PLC and two Reckitt Benckiser entities in Suboxone (Buprenorphine/Naloxone) Film Products Liability Litigation in the multidistrict litigation centralized in the Northern District of Ohio. The court’s decision is a significant setback for individuals who suffered serious Suboxone side effects and dental damage from using the sublingual film form of the drug. They allege that Indivior and other defendants failed to adequately warn about the potential for dental erosion and decay associated with the film's acidic properties.
#4 The Impact of Viking River Cruises on PAGA Claims: What Happened in Agustin Gutierrez v. Panera LLCLos Angeles, CA - On October 22, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District held that an employee whose employment agreement explicitly excluded Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims from arbitration, did not have to arbitrate those claims against his employer. The terms of his contract effectively trumped a change in law that occurred after the agreement was made.
#5 Cinepolis Charged with Multiple California Labor Law ViolationsLos Angeles, CA - On October 21, Jacqueline Honorio filed a proposed class action lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of at least 100 individuals who worked for USA Cinema Services LLC, which does business as Cinepolis. Honorio v. USA Cinema Services LLC alleges that Cinepolis violated the California labor code in a wide variety of ways.
#6 Zantac Maker Agrees to $2.2 Billion SettlementSanta Clara, CA - The drug maker GSK agreed a few weeks ago to pay up to $2.2 billion to resolve Zantac lawsuits. The blockbuster heartburn drug, which was sold over-the-counter, was removed from the market in 2020 after the FDA ordered all ranitidine (the generic name) products withdrawn, citing unacceptable levels of the chemical N-nitroso dimethylamine (NDMA), a probable human carcinogen.
#7 Valsartan Lawsuit October 2024 UpdateSanta Clara, CA - Every day, doctors prescribe Valsartan--an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)--to help patients manage high blood pressure. This drug, known under brand names like Diovan and Prexxartan, is effective in reducing hypertension by relaxing blood vessels.
#8 BP Retirees Win Long-Fought ERISA Lawsuit -- Sort ofHouston, TX - On March 28, Judge George C. Hanks of the Southern District of Texas held that more than 7,000 North Slope Alaskan pipeline retirees who had participated in the BP America Retirement Plan (BP plan) were entitled to equitable relief under Section 502(a)(3) of ERISA. Guenther v. BP Retirement Accumulation Plan, a long-running ERISA lawsuit, alleges that BP "committed fraud or similarly inequitable conduct" in how it announced a pension formula change more than 30 years ago.
#9 Schobinger v. Twitter: A Setback for Class CertificationSan Francisco, CA - On October 16, the District Court for the Northern District of California denied plaintiff Mark Schobinger’s petition for class certification in Schobinger v. Twitter. The California labor employment lawsuit centers on allegations that, during Elon Musk’s protracted takeover over the social media company in October 2022, Twitter, now X, misled users about the security of their data.
#10 Employee Stock Ownership Lawsuit Unmasks Brazen Corporate FraudRiverside, CA - The allegations made in Gamino v. KPC Healthcare are pretty lurid, especially as ERISA lawsuits go. Even apart from the loaded handgun and the slashed tires, the Complaint tells a tale of shocking financial malfeasance.
Incoming! Top Leads for the Last 30 Days
REACH LAWYERS Advertise on Online Legal Media's weekly Class Action Newsletter to 60,000 lawyers:
See our exclusive packages >LETTER TO EDITOR Please feel free to contact our newsletter editor with your comments or suggestions.
Contact editor > Lawyers: Seeking Clients? Advertise with
Online Legal Media for a steady stream of potential clients. Over 3 million visitors annually!
Advertise With Us Stay Informed! Get info on
TWICE as many cases and settlements by subscribing to our legal news & class action newsletter for a low annual fee.
Subscribe Now Visit All Online Legal Media Websites CONTACT US UNSUBSCRIBE If you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please click > [
UNSUBSCRIBE] The information provided in this newsletter has been prepared by Online Legal Media, and is for general informational purposes only. The information in this newsletter may be considered advertising under various states rules governing lawyer professional conduct.
You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information on this newsletter. This information does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. The information provided in this newsletter is not privileged and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Submitting a case evaluation or any type of response or other information through this newsletter will not create an attorney-client relationship and nothing contained in this newsletter is to be considered an offer to represent you.
Information appearing in this newsletter may only be reproduced in its entirety (without modification, and must include this Notice) for the individual reader's personal or educational use. Transmission of the information appearing in this newsletter is not intended to create, and its receipt by the reader does not establish or constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
Online Legal Media 849 Almar Avenue, Suite C-197, Santa Cruz, CA, USA 95060
© 2001-2024 Online Legal Media. All Rights Reserved.
