Jul 25, 2024 View in Browser

ALM | Law.com

Barometer

Click to view Newsletters Links

Tracking Key Shifts in the Legal Ecosystem

Each week, the Law.com Barometer newsletter, powered by the ALM Global Newsroom and Legalweek brings you the trends, disruptions, and shifts our reporters and editors are tracking through coverage spanning every beat and region across the ALM Global Newsroom. The micro-topic coverage will not only help you navigate the changing legal landscape but also prepare you to discuss these shifts with thousands of legal leaders at Legalweek 2025, taking place from March 24-27, 2025, in New York City. Registration will be opening soon.

The Disruption: Legal Industry Gears Up as Presidential Election Hangs in the Balance

 

Attorneys are springing into action to prepare themselves, and their clients, for the possible outcomes of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. 

 

It’s hard to imagine a corner of the U.S. legal world that won’t be impacted by the election results in November, from juror behavior in a heightened political environment to agency enforcement. 

 

Some lawyers are even helping drive the campaigns through fundraising and serving in advisory roles.

 

Election-related matters, or at least concerns, have already landed on the desks of litigation, transactional and regulatory attorneys alike.

The Conversation

 

Presidential hopeful Kamala Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff seem to be leveraging their ties to the legal community, with Harris coming up as a district attorney and attorney general in California and Emhoff, a former partner at DLA Piper.

 

Brad Karp, chair of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, said “I’m working with many business leaders to raise money for the Harris campaign to enable her to fund what will inevitably be the most expensive election battle ever and provide whatever additional support I can, including voter protection support.”

 

Meanwhile, Karp’s colleague Karen Dunn, who is co-chair of the firm’s litigation department, is assisting Harris with debate prep, according to a source familiar with the arrangements.

 

Zeughauser Group Founder Peter Zeughauser expects a “massive outpouring of support from the legal community” for Harris.

 

“I don’t think there’s an Am Law 200 firm that won’t have a significant cadre of attorneys, partners and associates who will organize on her behalf and fundraise,” Zeughauser said.

 

Some election law attorneys are also faced with the question of what will happen to President Joe Biden’s campaign funds. Earlier this week, the Trump campaign filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission, arguing the transfer of funds from Biden to Harris would violate campaign finance rules.  

 

“A lot of this is uncharted because we are in a scenario that hasn’t come up previously, since the [Federal Election Campaign Act] was passed,” said one political law attorney who spoke only on condition of anonymity to speak freely. “So a lot of what people are saying is going to be drawn from existing FEC precedent that is established in other contexts. … There is an element of uncertainty with all of this.”

The Significance

 

Litigators are also bracing for how the presidential election could impact juror behavior and the type of tactics they might see in the courtroom. 

 

“I suppose that worried, divisive, fearful jurors will be a different group than you were talking to pre-pandemic. I’ve been mostly focused on the different legal issues that we’ll see a change because of the divisive political climate,” said Denise Keyser, a labor and employment lawyer at Ballard Spahr. 

 

Keyser said lawyers might have to consider how they get the attention of jurors who might be more distracted and unhappy in the political climate. “Maybe you have more plaintiffs’ lawyers arguing conspiracy theories? Maybe you have more jurors who are more willing to accept these kinds of conspiracy theories?” she said.

 

On the transactional side, the uncertain fate of the executive branch has sewn unease into dealmaking, but it might be too soon to predict how it will affect activity. 

 

Sam Snider, a partner in the transactions practice at McDermott Will & Emery, said in an email, “From a strategic M&A perspective, I think it was still a little early in the election cycle for companies to act based on any anticipated outcome. As with PE sponsors, I think you will see continued caution from dealmakers in industries heavily impacted by trade policy and inflation, but I expect that players in industries with ongoing megatrends like the energy transition will continue with deals intended to meet longer-term needs.”

Although some regulatory attorneys expect that another term for former President Donald Trump would tone down antitrust enforcement, others predict continued aggression from agencies, particularly in certain sectors.

 

“No respite for Big Tech—Both Trump and Harris would continue to target the sector,” said James C. Cooper, who specializes in competition law as an Antonin Scalia Law School professor at George Mason University. “I wouldn’t see Trump dropping any of the cases against Facebook, Google or Amazon. Conservatives have it in for Big Tech because they see these platforms as silencing conservative voices.”

 

The Information

 

Want to know more? Here’s what we’ve discovered in the ALM Global Newsroom:

  • Lawyers in Big Law Kick Off Fundraising and Organizing for Kamala Harris

  • 'Uncharted' Waters: Attorneys Debate What Happens to Joe Biden's Campaign Money If He Steps Aside

  • 'Fearful Jurors': Tumultuous Election Season Has Reached Jury Rooms

  • Deal Watch: What Does Biden's Exit Mean for the Deal Market?

  • 'No Respite for Big Tech': Law Experts Weigh Post-Biden Antitrust Enforcement

  • Georgia Election Lawyers Foresee More Work as Challenges Loom to Biden's Withdrawal

  • With Uncertainty Over President Biden, Lawyers Field Client Questions Over Election

 

The Forecast

 

Even before one of the presidential candidates emerges victorious, election attorneys foresee potential legal challenges. 

 

As the general counsel of the Georgia Republican Party, Alex Kaufman of Chalmers, Adams, Backer & Kaufman said party officials are reviewing the legality of Biden’s decision to drop out of the race. “Given the timing, it appears at first glance and upon initial legal research that the Democrats will be able to have their presidential nominee’s name—whomever that may be—on Georgia’s General Election ballot,” Kaufman said. 

 

Outside of the immediate future, Jeremy Berry, a partner with Chilivis Grubman in Atlanta, expects election lawyers to be “busy in and out of court this fall and after the election,” because the presidential election could be close in many states, particularly with Biden’s “decision not to seek reelection.”

 

Berry said, “We have seen the rise of litigation surrounding elections in recent years to challenge election laws, voter registration efforts, voter eligibility, election results and much more.”

 

Alaina Lancaster is the editor-in-chief, Litigation and Law.com. Contact her at alancaster@alm.com and follow him on Twitter: @a_lancaster3

 

 

 

 

 
FacebookTwitterInstagramLinkedIn

Connect With Law.com

This newsletter was sent to newsletter@newslettercollector.com
Unsubscribe |  Email Preferences |  About Us |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC.
All Rights Reserved.
ALM Global, LLC
150 E 42nd St | New York, NY 10017 | 1-800-543-0874