'New York' and Vulture’s Andrea Long Chu Wins Pulitzer Prize for Criticism

Laden...

1 jaar geleden

Html
Tekst

She is the magazine’s second winner in five years.

New York and Vulture’s Andrea Long Chu Wins Pulitzer Prize for Criticism

New York and Vulture readers know: Andrea Long Chu has a one-of-a-kind mind. She dives as deeply as anyone possibly can into her subject’s work, interview history, and life, and she comes out the other side with big opinionated swings that you will encounter nowhere else, delivered in prose that swoops and soars like an Olympian. This afternoon, the Pulitzer committee up at Columbia University recognized what we have known for a while, awarding her the 2023 prize for criticism.

The pieces for which she was recognized are listed here but a few leap to mind if you need to catch up in a hurry. When reading Hanya Yanagihara, known for excruciatingly evocative fiction, Chu discerned that the most interesting relationship in the work was not among the characters but between the author and her characters—whom Yanagihara makes ill so she can nurse them back to health. Chu took the opposite approach to the recent trend of the mixed-race Asian character in literature, exploring how an archetype can become an idea for the authors who use it, in this case considering what it means to be Asian American enough. More recently, she marked the centenary of The Velveteen Rabbitwith a warm appreciation, and also reminded us all just how shlocky Andrew Lloyd Webber’s musicals can be—and how influential they are nonetheless.

Part of the pleasure of reading Chu comes from her fearlessness; her pieces are often celebrated on Twitter with lines like “I would like to report a murder.” She uses a scalpel, though, not a blunt instrument: Those exquisitely crafted sentences articulate fundamental truths about the work as precisely as possible. “This is the problem with writing to wake people up: Your ideal reader is inevitably asleep,” she writes of Ottessa Moshfegh’s books. And there, you see that Chu is revealing herself, too: You can start to discern how she gravitates toward authors she doesn’t fully agree with, where there might be a little friction inherent to the critical project. Out of that friction comes a review whose arrival is always an event. We are proud to publish her, and offer our congratulations.

– The Editors