DANES TAKE CHARGE. Copenhagen will take charge of the rotating Council presidency on Tuesday, and from what we’ve heard, they’re putting defence at the top of the agenda. Until 2022, Denmark had an opt-out on EU defence policy, so their embrace of the issue underscores its importance – and the huge shift in thinking Europe has seen over the past few years. That said, the COUNCIL CONCLUSIONS on defence were rather thin on substance even after EU leaders spent nearly three hours discussing the topic in Brussels. Firepower overheard one person quip that the meeting was more of “a post-NATO therapy session” (perhaps they discussed their daddy issues). EU leaders come back in October for a progress review of the defence readiness agenda. Until then, watch out for the presentation of the Commission’s proposal for the EU’s next seven-year budget (the Multiannual Financial Framework, MFF) on 16 July. MORE FINANCING? Now that (almost) all Europeans have committed to the 5% target, it’s time to ask how to fund the scale up. Several EU countries raised the idea yesterday of getting more flexibility around the EU’s Stability and Growth Pact budget rules. Currently, 16 countries have asked the Commission to activate the national escape clause, allowing them to go beyond their deficit cap and borrow an extra 1.5% of annual GDP for defence over the next four years. Another option batted around in Brussels is repurposing cohesion funds for dual-use “defence-related” projects (think tech or infrastructure). The idea was raised once again by Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas in a joint letter. That spending, by the way, would now count towards NATO’s new accounting that counts spending of up to 1.5% of GDP on defence-related items. DEFENCE BANK COMING UP? The possibility of creating a publicly backed multilateral bank to provide financing to the arms industry has been gaining traction, according to the man pitching the idea. Rob Murray, a former NATO official and current defence industry executive, spoke with Firepower recently about his pitch to create the Defence, Security & Resilience Bank (DSR), which he believes could start “initial operations” as early as the end of the year. Poland proposed creating a defence bank at a meeting of EU defence ministers in early April, but it’s yet to gain enough support to become a reality. WHY A BANK? There have been widespread complaints from defence industry leaders that they’ve struggled to secure financing for ramping up production and innovation – partly because investors are unsure whether rearmament will remain enough of a long-term priority to justify major outlays. Murray said an institution like the DSR could step in to provide cheaper credit and a long-term perspective to allow industry to increase capacity and invest in innovation. He envisioned launching the bank with €100 billion in capital. Murray declined to say WHICH LEADERS have expressed a willingness to sign up, but said that none of the “dozens of countries I talked to" appeared uninterested in the project. Europe is a focus, but Murray said it would make sense to involve countries like Canada, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, and Australia. Those countries host important production capacities, and would also bring scale. What matters, he said, is "less about the number but rather about the size of GDP – we need a blend”. |