This concept isn’t as new as it might seem. Human financial advisors have relied on algorithm-driven investing by way of specialized software for well over a decade. In other words, traditional advisors already use algorithms to determine portfolio allocations for their clients based on those clients’ stated goals, time horizon and desired level of risk. What’s new about robo-advising is that it has made such software directly available to consumers, and at a lower cost. Robo-advisors are popular. While market estimates vary, it’s clear that millions of human clients entrust more than a trillion dollars in combined assets to the care of robots. But such robots have mixed success. The investment app Titan tracked 44 robo-advisors over the 12 months ending Sept. 30, 2021, and found that returns ranged from a low of 13.37% to a high of 25.17%, compared to a 29.4% total return on the S&P 500 during the same period. In other words, you could have beaten the robots by simply buying index funds. (Index funds are funds that mirror the contents of an entire market index, such as the S&P 500; such funds therefore perform as well, or as badly, as the overall market.) If you can beat robots with index funds, why would anyone invest with a robot? It’s a good question, and one that mirrors an ongoing tension in the financial world. On average, active investment management by human advisors does not outperform what’s called “passive” investing. Passive investing means buying index funds in order to capture the performance of the overall market; active management, by contrast, seeks to beat the market — but runs the risk of underperforming. Active management also carries higher fees than simply purchasing index funds, because of the human labor involved in selecting stocks. Some of today’s human advisors don’t recommend, or perform, active management for their clients, but instead simply recommend index funds and other relatively low-risk investments, and then help clients adjust their portfolios as their goals change. Human advisors also sometimes help their clients avoid panic selling. “The downside to robo-advisors is that they won't stop you from selling your investments when you feel like running for the exit signs during a market downturn,” said Spencer Sherman, who founded financial consulting firm Abacus Wealth. Yet there are also benefits to robo-advisors, which tend to carry the lowest fees of any type of advising.
“Robo-advisors can work well for people who want to do things themselves but have the robo-advisor automatically rebalance their portfolio,” said Sherman. Rebalancing means selling certain assets and buying others as prices fluctuate, in order to maintain a specific desired portfolio allocation. Such portfolio maintenance is something that wealthy investors have long had human advisors perform on their behalf, and is now available to ordinary investors at a low cost, thanks to automation. For those Punk Rock Financiers who want the help of automated investing to augment their own ability to buy, sell and rebalance, there are some powerful tools available. |