Reforming the presidential nominations process, how AI will change the workforce, and the last episode of And Now the Hard Part podcast.
Automation, work, and skills “While the long arc of history has shown that, by and large, past technological change has us wealthier and more productive, it is important to consider both the needs of people potentially harmed in the interim and potential policy choices that can mitigate the harm.” Marcus Casey and Sarah Nuzu write about how AI will factor into the future of work. Read more | Too much democracy is bad for democracy “At the most fundamental level—the level of electoral math and cognitive bandwidth—primaries are an inherently flawed mechanism for registering voter preferences.” Jonathan Rauch and Ray La Raja write about the “bizarre” presidential primary nominating process used by American political parties today and argue for reform. Read more in the Atlantic In her Big Idea for Policy 2020, Elaine Kamarck offers a solution on how to fix this problem: restoring “peer review” in the nominating system. | The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. | |