Washington Post / Erik Wemple
How much abuse can a local newspaper reporter take? →“Those attacks have implications for the newspaper on many fronts, including its morale, its financial viability and its ability to build trust with conservatives in its own circulation area. Yet the events in Lancaster County bear just as heavily on a question that has vexed leaders in journalism in recent decades: Just how should they respond to the frequent, strident and often flimsy attacks from Republican politicians? Should they stick to the industry’s default mode of turning the other cheek? Or should they speak up to challenge the gripes?”
The New York Times / Adam Liptak and Sapna Maheshwari
Supreme Court to hear TikTok’s challenge to law that could ban it →“In setting aside two hours for the argument, the justices signaled that they viewed the case as presenting questions of exceptional importance…The court did not block the law while the case moves forward, which suggested that it may issue a ruling before the Jan. 19 deadline set by the law. That would mean that the case may be resolved before President-elect Donald J. Trump is inaugurated on Jan. 20.”
The Atlantic / Kaitlyn Tiffany
The pro-eating-disorder internet is back →“Most of the large social-media platforms have been aware of this reality for years and have undertaken at least basic measures to address it…X is not only hosting eating-disorder content but actively recommending it in the algorithmically generated ‘For You’ feed, even if people don’t wish to see it”
The New York Times / Brooks Barnes
Inside Disney’s decision to settle the Trump suit against ABC News →“Disney executives had anticipated the blowback. But they also determined that they had a flawed case — and that the company could risk damaging press protections for everyone by continuing to fight, as well as hurt the Disney brand…In the worst-cast scenario, Disney concluded, fighting the case could lead to the Supreme Court and become a vehicle for Mr. Trump and his allies to overturn the landmark First Amendment decision in New York Times v. Sullivan.”