Our brief national entertainment industry nightmare is over: After months of drama and campaigning, MAGA-loving old guy Nelson Peltz has failed (miserably, it appears) in his noisy attempt to invade the Disney board of directors. Whatever you make of the criticisms of CEO Bob Iger and the Mouse Houseâs streaming strategy, the fact is that Peltz leaned heavily on the far rightâs creepy anti-Disney fetish to build support for his efforts. He got mad about Marvel movies being âwokeâ and enlisted help from Trump-loving billionaires like Elon Musk and Ike Perlmutter. Even if many calm, rational business minds agreed with Peltzâs critiques of the Disney board, his financial fight in some ways became another sort of proxy battle â yet another front in the culture wars. For that reason alone, it was a relief to see Peltz go down so hard. |
As for this weekâs Buffering, Iâm turning over the newsletter to my colleague Eric Villas-Boas while Iâm working on some future projects. Prompted by the success of FXâs ShÅgun on Hulu, heâs been doing some digging into a very important question: Why isnât the original 1980 miniseries streaming anywhere in the U.S.? Thanks for reading. âJoe Adalian |
Enjoying Buffering? Share this email with your friends, and click here to read previous editions. |
Stay updated on all the news from the streaming wars. Subscribe now for unlimited access to Vulture and everything New York. |
| | Photo: Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images | |
FX and Huluâs yelling-heavy adaptation of James Clavellâs novel ShÅgun is one of this seasonâs most exciting debuts. The show tosses samurai action, Japanese court intrigue, and religious conflict into its compulsively watchable cultural soup and chases the mixture with sake and earthquakes. But ShÅgun 2024 is actually the bookâs second spin on TV. The first was a five-episode miniseries produced by Paramount Television that aired on NBC in 1980. However, if you want to stream the vintage adaptation, starring Richard Chamberlain and Toshiro Mifune, you may need to do some sleuthing: Itâs not available to legally stream anywhere or rent or buy digitally on VOD. How could this be? We asked an army of licensing executives and company spokespeople to find out. |
Letâs get this out of the way: ShÅgun is technically available to stream somewhere. Itâs not on any official channels but is available on the Internet Archive, the nonprofit and digital library known for cataloguing lost media â from obscure anime dubs to dearly departed websites. The Internet Archive has a couple versions of ShÅgun 1980 â both a four-part versionthat was released on DVD in 2003 and a partial rip of the 2014 HD-remastered Blu-ray release, which spread the miniseries across three discs. (Those filesâ 1080p quality is way better, but only video from the first two discs appears to have made it to the Archive; the link for part three has no video â not ideal.) Thereâs also some debate in the Internet Archive comments and on Reddit over whether that four-part version is in fact the complete and uncut ShÅgun; the Blu-ray release I picked up has a running time of nine hours and nine minutes, while the four-parterâs time stamps add up to 22 and a half minutes short of that. |
Still, the showâs absence from any of the major streaming outlets seems bizarre. What is Paramount, whose parent company holds the license, thinking? ShÅgun 1980 is neither an obscurity nor an example of lost media. The show represented the prestige TV of its time â it was made for $22 million ($69 million in modern-day dollars), aired to an audience of 25 million, and starred bona fide movie stars in Chamberlain and Mifune. It won Paramount and NBC a Peabody, a pair of Emmys, and the Golden Globes for Best Television Series (Drama), Actor, and Actress after its television debut, and it broke taboos with portrayals of beheading, nudity, and disciplinary urination. (If Cosmo Jarvis getting pissed on shocked you a month ago, imagine watching the same scene on a network at 8 p.m. in 1980.) They even turned it into a computer game. And the miniseries never really disappeared, either. Today, ShÅgunâs 2014 Blu-ray is still in print and up on Amazon for $27 â released under Paramount Pictures Home Entertainment. |
So why isnât it on streaming? Representatives for FX and Huluâs new ShÅgun, for their part, made it clear their show had nothing to do with the old oneâs absence from streaming. âOurs is an original adaptation of the book with zero connection to the miniseries,â an FX spokesperson said, denying that there was any contractual reason the new showâs release would bar the old oneâs distribution. Meanwhile, sources at NBC confirmed their network just aired the 1980 show and had no claim on its distribution today, punting questions related to the 1980 miniseries to the company that produced it. |
Which brings us back to Paramount. The company declined to comment on why ShÅgun 1980 isnât streaming, but the answer may be tangled in the companyâs spiderweb history of mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations. (Two years ago, it was called ViacomCBS.) Many of the shows produced by Paramount Television later moved under the ownership of its sister company, CBS, and ShÅgunâs licensing today is overseen by Paramount Global Content Distribution. Itâs not as if itâs completely lost to time â as is the case with shows like Murphy Brown, which has so many music rights to negotiate that thereâs little hope of seeing it again. ShÅgun, Vulture has learned, is currently licensed in select territories internationally. And sources at Paramount also tell us that itâs currently available to be licensed in the U.S. |
In other words, thereâs nothing stopping Netflix, Hulu, or even PGCDâs own corporate sibling Paramount+ from paying a license fee and offering it to subscribers. Or if the SVOD players donât think ShÅgun is worth the cash, PGCD could put the show on a FAST platform â Tubi, Freevee, or its other sibling, Pluto TV â and just make money from ad sales on the title. Licensing decisions can be made for a number of reasons, but after more than a week of asking multiple employees at three major media companies why a 44-year-old show wasnât streaming and getting no clear answer, I began to wonder: Did anyone at Paramount really care that they owned ShÅgun? Given all the hoopla around FXâs ShÅgun adaptation, why wouldnât someone at Paramount+ decide to carry its own adaptation to capitalize on the buzz? Could a clause in some dusty old contract somehow make it more expensive to put on streaming than the average show? Could they have seen putting the old miniseries on Paramount+ as doing free marketing for FX and Huluâs parent company, Disney? |
Of course, this isnât a particularly unusual situation in the streaming age. Too many shows like ShÅgun live in licensing purgatory â un-streamable despite the fact that their parent company owns them outright. Over the last couple years, several streaming services â most visibly Max, Disney+, and Hulu â have decided that the cost of platforming too many old library titles was just too high, given the residuals that would have to be paid out, music rights, or other factors. Paramount+ itself removed a slate of Nickelodeon shows just last week. Audiences today canât enjoy hit shows like Thirtysomething or Homicide: Life on the Street without resorting to extralegal downloads or shelling out for exorbitantly pricey, out-of-print, or incomplete DVD sets. |
But when it comes to ShÅgun, itâs a missed opportunity to recirculate a classic, if dated, telling of Clavellâs story. Paramount Global could certainly release that remastered version digitally on either Paramount+ or any VOD platform and bill it as âthe award-winning original.â Doing so could showcase it to a new audience, lay the commentariatâs questions to rest, and jab at its streaming competitors at FX and Hulu with some counterprogramming. Streaming fights are fun, after all! NBCUniversalâs Peacock licensed the more faithful adaptation of 3 Body Problem a few weeks before Netflix dropped its own in March â why canât we have dueling ShÅguns? |
| |
|