What happens when the Justice Department files a brief against a federal agency?; Law, virtual reality and augmented reality; Institutional formalism and realism in the Trump presidency; Will the D.C. Court of Appeals rehear the Michael Mann defamation case?; When should courts rely on Wikipedia?; The most important part of Judge Bybee’s dissent from denial of en banc review in Washington v. Trump; 9th Circuit oral argument on historical cell-site information;
 
The Volokh Conspiracy
 
 
What happens when the Justice Department files a brief against a federal agency?
The Department of Justice has filed an amicus brief opposing the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Video of Cato Institute panel on Murr v. Wisconsin
A panel on an important takings case that will be argued before the Supreme Court on March 20.
Law, virtual reality and augmented reality
A new article from Stanford professor Mark Lemley and me.
 
Institutional formalism and realism in the Trump presidency
An insightful 2014 article by Rick Pildes that helps inform judicial review of the Trump presidency.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Will the D.C. Court of Appeals rehear the Michael Mann defamation case?
The D.C. Court of Appeals has the opportunity to correct a decision that threatens robust discourse.
 
When should courts rely on Wikipedia?
The Texas Supreme Court opines on this.
 
The most important part of Judge Bybee’s dissent from denial of en banc review in Washington v. Trump
Even while agreeing with the Trump administration on the law, a judge challenges Trump's treatment of judges.
 
9th Circuit oral argument on historical cell-site information
Is accessing the phone company's records a Fourth Amendment "search"?
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2017 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071