Good morning from Strasbourg, Before the end of the day, Ursula von der Leyen will know whether she will remain in the European Union’s top job for the next five years- and she has every reason to be confident. If the next few hours unfold as expected after a few intense days of presentation and negotiation in Strasbourg, a majority in the newly elected European Parliament should vote for her. In short, von der Leyen's second term as Commission President is just one compromise speech away, and every word counts. However, some potential obstacles remain that could hinder von der Leyen's path to the Berlaymont, including one that seems particularly impossible to overcome. How can both Greens and Conservatives be satisfied with the fate of combustion engines? How can she unite the Spanish left and the German right on Gaza? How can she be tough on migration and convince even the hard-right ECR without losing the Socialists and Greens? Von der Leyen doesn’t have the option of avoiding clarity by sounding mysterious or evasive on the most sensitive matters, at the risk of sounding weak before even starting. Her campaign is focused on strengthening her leadership, according to the accounts of those who attended her closed-door presentations to different political families in recent days. They expect Von der Leyen 2.0 to appear rather pragmatic today, delivering more or less a campaign speech, as they described it to Euractiv reporters in Strasbourg. Partly, she can rely on the well-understood self-interest of other parties, as they all have something to lose by not voting for her and provoking the ire of the EPP. The Liberals could lose their top job - Estonia's former prime minister Kaja Kallas who recently resigned in anticipation of her new role - the Italian ECR members, the vice-presidency in the Commission, and the Greens of any influence they have left. But the negotiations are not over and the multiplayer chess game continues. Von der Leyen is already preparing for the next round: the composition of the next Commission. Member states have communicated their preferences to her, and most of them have given names. |